君主论-the prince(英文版)- 第2部分

kept　down　thegreater；　and　did　not　allow　any　strong　foreign　powers　to　gain　authority。Greece　appears　to　me　sufficient　for　an　example。　The　Achaeans　andAetolians　were　kept　friendly　by　them；　the　kingdom　of　Macedonia　washumbled；　Antiochus　was　driven　out；　yet　the　merits　of　the　Achaeans　andAetolians　never　secured　for　them　permission　to　increase　their　power；　nordid　the　persuasions　of　Philip　ever　induce　the　Romans　to　be　his　friendswithout　first　humbling　him；　nor　did　the　influence　of　Antiochus　make　themagree　that　he　should　retain　any　lordship　over　the　country。　Because　theRomans　did　in　these　instances　what　all　prudent　princes　ought　to　do；　whohave　to　regard　not　only　present　troubles；　but　also　future　ones；　forwhich　they　must　prepare　with　every　energy；　because；　when　foreseen；　it　iseasy　to　remedy　them；　but　if　you　wait　until　they　approach；　the　medicineis　no　longer　in　time　because　the　malady　has　bee　incurable；　for　ithappens　in　this；　as　the　physicians　say　it　happens　in　hectic　fever；　thatin　the　beginning　of　the　malady　it　is　easy　to　cure　but　difficult　todetect；　but　in　the　course　of　time；　not　having　been　either　detected　ortreated　in　the　beginning；　it　bees　easy　to　detect　but　difficult　tocure。　Thus　it　happens　in　affairs　of　state；　for　when　the　evils　that　arisehave　been　foreseen　（which　it　is　only　given　to　a　wise　man　to　see）；　theycan　be　quickly　redressed；　but　when；　through　not　having　been　foreseen；they　have　been　permitted　to　grow　in　a　way　that　every　one　can　see　them。there　is　no　longer　a　remedy。　Therefore；　the　Romans；　foreseeing　troubles；dealt　with　them　at　once；　and；　even　to　avoid　a　war；　would　not　let　theme　to　a　head；　for　they　knew　that　war　is　not　to　be　avoided；　but　is　onlyput　off　to　the　advantage　of　others；　moreover　they　wished　to　fight　withPhilip　and　Antiochus　in　Greece　so　as　not　to　have　to　do　it　in　Italy；　theycould　have　avoided　both；　but　this　they　did　not　wish；　nor　did　that　everplease　them　which　is　for　ever　in　the　mouths　of　the　wise　ones　of　ourtime：……　Let　us　enjoy　the　benefits　of　the　time　……　but　rather　the　benefits　oftheir　own　valour　and　prudence；　for　time　drives　everything　before　it；　andis　able　to　bring　with　it　good　as　well　as　evil；　and　evil　as　well　as　good。But　let　us　turn　to　France　and　inquire　whether　she　has　done　any　of　thethings　mentioned。　I　will　speak　of　Louis　＇XII＇　（and　not　of　Charles＇VIII＇）　as　the　one　whose　conduct　is　the　better　to　be　observed；　he　havingheld　possession　of　Italy　for　the　longest　period；　and　you　will　see　thathe　has　done　the　opposite　to　those　things　which　ought　to　be　done　toretain　a　state　posed　of　divers　elements。King　Louis　was　brought　into　Italy　by　the　ambition　of　the　Veians；　whodesired　to　obtain　half　the　state　of　Lombardy　by　his　intervention。　I　willnot　blame　the　course　taken　by　the　king；　because；　wishing　to　get　afoothold　in　Italy；　and　having　no　friends　there　……　seeing　rather　thatevery　door　was　shut　to　him　owing　to　the　conduct　of　Charles　……　he　wasforced　to　accept　those　friendships　which　he　could　get；　and　he　would　havesucceeded　very　quickly　in　his　design　if　in　other　matters　he　had　not　madesome　mistakes。　The　king；　hobardy；　regained　atonce　the　authority　which　Charles　had　lost：　Genoa　yielded；　theFlorentines　became　his　friends；　the　Marquess　of　Mantua；　the　Duke　ofFerrara；　the　Bentivoglio；　my　lady　of　Forli；　the　Lords　of　Faenza；　ofPesaro；　of　Rimini；　of　Camerino；　of　Piombino；　the　Lucchesi；　the　Pisans；the　Sienese　……　everybody　made　advances　to　him　to　bee　his　friend。　Thencould　the　Veians　realize　the　rashness　of　the　course　taken　by　them；which；　in　order　that　they　might　secure　two　towns　in　Lombardy；　had　madethe　king　master　of　two…thirds　of　Italy。Let　any　one　now　consider　with　what　little　difficulty　the　king　could　havemaintained　his　position　in　Italy　had　he　observed　the　rules　above　laiddown；　and　kept　all　his　friends　secure　and　protected；　for　although　theywere　numerous　they　were　both　weak　and　timid；　some　afraid　of　the　Church；some　of　the　Veians；　and　thus　they　would　always　have　been　forced　tostand　in　with　him；　and　by　their　means　he　could　easily　have　made　himselfsecure　against　those　who　remained　powerful。　But　he　was　no　sooner　inMilan　than　he　did　the　contrary　by　assisting　Pope　Alexander　to　occupy　theRomagna。　It　never　occurred　to　him　that　by　this　action　he　was　weakeninghimself；　depriving　himself　of　friends　and　those　who　had　thrownthemselves　into　his　lap；　whilst　he　aggrandized　the　Church　by　adding　muchtemporal　power　to　the　spiritual；　thus　giving　it　great　authority。　Andhaving　mitted　this　prime　error；　he　was　obliged　to　follow　it　up；　somuch　so　that；　to　put　an　end　to　the　ambition　of　Alexander；　and　to　preventhis　being　the　master　of　Tuscany；　he　was　himself　forced　to　e　intoItaly。And　as　if　it　were　not　enough　to　have　aggrandized　the　Church；　anddeprived　himself　friends；　he；　wishing　to　have　the　kingdom　of　Naples；divides　it　with　the　King　of　Spain；　and　where　he　was　the　prime　arbiter　ofItaly　he　takes　an　associate；　so　that　the　ambitious　of　that　country　andthe　malcontents　of　his　own　should　have　where　to　shelter；　and　whereas　hecould　have　left　in　the　kingdom　his　own　pensioner　as　king；　he　drove　himout；　to　put　one　there　who　was　able　to　drive　him；　Louis；　out　in　turn。The　wish　to　acquire　is　in　truth　very　natural　and　mon；　and　men　alwaysdo　so　when　they　can；　and　for　this　they　will　be　praised　not　blamed；　butwhen　they　cannot　do　so；　yet　wish　to　do　so　by　any　means；　then　there　isfolly　and　blame。　Therefore；　if　France　could　have　attacked　Naples　withher　own　forces　she　ought　to　have　done　so；　if　she　could　not；　then　sheought　not　to　have　divided　it。　And　if　the　partition　which　she　made　withthe　Veians　in　Lombardy　was　justified　by　the　excuse　that　by　it　she　gota　foothold　in　Italy；　this　other　partition　merited　blame；　for　it　had　notthe　excuse　of　that　necessity。Therefore　Louis　made　these　five　errors：　he　destroyed　the　minor　powers；he　increased　the　strength　of　one　of　the　greater　powers　in　Italy；　hebrought　in　a　foreign　power；　he　did　not　settle　in　the　country；　he　did　notsend　colonies。　Which　errors；　if　he　had　lived；　were　not　enough　to　injurehim　had　he　not　made　a　sixth　by　taking　away　their　dominions　from　theVeians；　because；　had　he　not　aggrandized　the　Church；　nor　brought　Spaininto　Italy；　it　would　have　been　very　reasonable　and　necessary　to　humblethem；　but　having　first　taken　these　steps；　he　ought　never　to　haveconsented　to　their　ruin；　for　they；　being　powerful；　would　always　havekept　off　others　from　designs　on　Lombardy；　to　which　the　Veians　wouldnever　have　consented　except　to　bee　masters　themselves　there；　alsobecause　the　others　would　not　wish　to　take　Lombardy　from　France　in　orderto　give　it　to　the　Veians；　and　to　run　counter　to　both　they　would　nothave　had　the　courage。And　if　any　one　should　say：　King　Louis　yielded　the　Romagna　to　Alexanderand　the　kingdom　to　Spain　to　avoid　war；　I　answer　for　the　reasons　givenabove　that　a　blunder　ought　never　be　perpetrated　to　avoid　war；　because　itis　not　to　be　avoided；　but　is　only　deferred　to　your　disadvantage。　And　ifanother　should　allege　the　pledge　which　the　king　had　given　to　the　Popethat　he　would　assist　him　in　the　enterprise；　in　exchange　for　thedissolution　of　his　marriage　and　for　the　hat　to　Rouen；　to　that　I　replywhat　I　shall　write　later　on　concerning　the　faith　of　princes；　and　how　itought　to　be　kept。Thus　King　Louis　lost　Lombardy　by　not　having　followed　any　of　theconditions　observed　by　those　who　have　taken　possession　of　countries　andwished　to　retain　them。　Nor　is　there　any　miracle　in　this；　but　much　thatis　reasonable　and　quite　natural。　And　on　these　matters　I　spoke　at　Nanteswith　Rouen；　when　Valentino；　＇1＇　as　Cesare　Borgia；　the　son　of　PopeAlexander；　was　usually　called；　occupied　the　Romagna；　and　on　CardinalRouen　observing　to　me　that　the　Italians　did　not　understand　war；　Ireplied　to　him　that　the　French　did　not　understand　statecraft；　meaningthat　otherwise　they　would　not　have　allowed　the　Church　to　reach　suchgreatness。　And　in　fact　it　has　been　seen　that　the　greatness　of　the　Churchand　of　Spain　in　Italy　has　been　caused　by　France；　and　her　ruin　may　beattributed　to　them。　From　this　a　general　rule　is　drawn　which　never　orrarely　fails：　that　he　who　is　the　cause　of　another　being　powerful　isruined；　because　that　predominancy　has　been　brought　about　either　byastuteness　or　else　by　force；　and　both　are　distrusted　by　him　who　has　beenraised　to　power。1。　So　called　……　in　Italian　……　from　the　duchy　of　Valentinois；　conferredon　him　by　Louis　XII。CHAPTER　IVWHY　THE　KINGDOM　OF　DARIUS；　CONQUERED　BY　ALEXANDER；　DID　NOT　REBEL　AGAINSTTHE　SUCCESSORS　OF　ALEXANDER　AT　HIS　DEATHCONSIDERING　the　difficulties　which　men　have　had　to　hold　a　neight　wonder　how；　seeing　that　Alexander　the　Great　became　themaster　of　Asia　in　a　few　years；　and　died　whilst　it　was　yet　scarcelysettled　（whence　it　might　appear　reasonable　that　the　whole　empire　wouldhave　rebelled）；　nevertheless　his　successors　maintained　themselves；　andhad　to　meet　no　other　difficulty　than　that　which　arose　among　themselvesfrom　their　own　ambitions。I　answer　that　the　principalities　of　which　one　has　record　are　found　to　begoverned　in　two　different　ways：　either　by　a　prince；　with　a　body　ofservants；　who　assist　him　to　govern　the　kingdom　as　ministers　by　hisfavour　and　permission；　or　by　a　prince　and　barons；　who　hold　that　dignityby　antiquity　of　blood　and　not　by　the　grace　of　the　prince。　Such　baronshave　states　and　their　own　subjects；　who　recognize　them　as　lords　and　holdthem　in　natural　affection。　Those　states　that　are　governed　by　a　princeand　his　servants　hold　their　prince　in　more　consideration；　because　in　allthe　country　there　is　no　one　who　is　recognized　as　superior　to　him；　and　ifthey　yield　obedience　to　another　they　do　it　as　to　a　minister　andofficial；　and　they　do　not　bear　him　any　particular　affection。The　examples　of　these　two　governments　in　our　time　are　the　Turk　and　theKing　of　France。　The　entire　monarchy　of　the　Turk　is　governed　by　one　lord；the　others　are　his　servants；　and；　dividing　his　kingdom　into　sanjaks；　hesends　there　different　administrators；　and　shifts　and　changes　them　as　hechooses。　But　the　King　of　France　is　placed　in　the　midst　of　an　ancientbody　of　lords；　acknowledged　by　their　own　subjects；　and　beloved　by　them；they　have　their　own　prerogatives；　nor　can　the　king　take　these　awayexcept　at　his　peril。　Therefore；　he　who　considers　both　of　these　stateswill　recognize　great　difficulties　in　seizing　the　state　of　the　Turk；　but；once　it　is　conquered；　great　ease　in　holding　it。　The　causes　of　thedifficulties　in　seizing　the　kingdom　of　the　Tur